SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(AP) 750

V.RAJAGOPALA REDDY
MAHMMODA BEGUM – Appellant
Versus
BADRUNNISA BEGUM – Respondent


V. RAJAGOPALA REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THESE appeals are taken up for disposal together, as they arise out of the common judgment in O. S. Nos. 301/74 and 215/79, respectively, on the file of the IV Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, and the parties are the same in all the suits and a joint trial is held in all these suits. All the appeals are brought by the defendant. In all the appeals the premises bearing h. No. 22-8-389-1 and 2, situate at Purani Haveli, Hyderabad, is the subject matter. The brief facts in each appeal are stated as under: ccca No. 149/87:

( 2 ) THIS appeal arises out of the judgment in O. S. 301 of 1974, which is asuit for recovery of Rs. 37,820/- towards arrears of rent together with interest at 6% p. a. , from the date of the suit.

( 3 ) THE respondent-plaintiff is the owner of the suit premises. She let outthe premises to the appellant under a rental deed dt. 22-2-1971, on a monthly rent of Rs. 1,100/ -. The appellant, contrary to the terms of the rental deed, sublet the premises andhas been collecting the rents. The appellant committed default in payment of rent and she has paid only Rs. 7,280/ -. Claiming an amount of Rs. 37,820/- towards arrears of rent


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top