SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(AP) 830

N.Y.HANUMANTHAPPA, NEELAM SANJIVA REDDY
New India Assurance Company Ltd. , Cuddapah – Appellant
Versus
Pesala Kishore Kumar – Respondent


N. Y. HANUMANTHAPPA, J.

( 1 ) CMA No. 324/91 has been directed against the order and decree dated 31-12-1990 in OP no. 101/88 on the file of the Motor Accidents claims Tribunal-cum-Additional District judge, Ongole, whereas CMA Nos. 1302/96, 1303/96, 1304/96 and 1305/96 have been directed against the order and decree dated 30-11-1995 made in OP Nos. 559/90, 560/90, 563/90 and 561/90 respectively on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims tribunal-cum-I Additional District Judge, kurnool.

( 2 ) THE appellant in all the above appeals is the Insurance Company. Since the point involved in all the appeals is common, they are clubbed and disposed of by a common judgment.

( 3 ) THE case of the claimant in OP no. 101/88 was mat on 28-10-1987 at about 8 p. m. while he was proceeding to vijayawada, the lorry bearing No. APD 6864 in which he was travelling met with an accident due to the rash and negligent driving of the driver who was working under respondent Nos. l and 2, the owners of the vehicle. Due to the said accident the claimant suffered injuries and his left hand was operated, and thus, he suffered total loss of movement of the left fore-arm joint and also left hand fingers. As such







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top