SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(AP) 851

K.B.SIDDAPPA
Voruganti Chinna Gopaiah – Appellant
Versus
Godavari Fertilizers, Chemicals – Respondent


K. B. SIDDAPPA, J.

( 1 ) THE Criminal Appeal is called from the file of Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Vijayawada. It is filed by the accused against the Judgment and sentence passed in CC No. 329 of 1991. The Criminal Revision Case is filed by the complainant on the ground that the sentence passed in CC No. 329 of 1991 is not adequate.

( 2 ) FIRST of all I would like to deal with the Criminal Appeal.

( 3 ) THE brief facts of the complaint are as follows:the Complainant who is the 1st respondent, is represented by its Accounts Officer Mr. P. S. Rao. It is stated that the 1st respondent-company is registered under the Companies Registration Act. It is a joint venture of the Government of Andhra Pradesh and IFFCO. The Company manufactures DAP and also deals in other composite fertilizers like Urea, Calcium etc. It has its Regional Marketing office at 40-7-27/a/2, Mogalrajapuram, Vijayawada. Accused No. 2 is representing the Accused No. 1 Rice and Flour Mill. They are doing business in fertilizers and pesticides. They are having a continuous running account with the Complainant-Company. The accused felt in arrears to the tune of Rs. 10,99,899. 90 ps. On 5-10-1991, Accused No. 1 gave a ch














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top