SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(AP) 850

C.V.N.SASTRY
UMA DEVI – Appellant
Versus
SHAIK HUSSAIN (PLAINTIFF) – Respondent


C. V. N. SASTRY, J.

( 1 ) HEARD the learned Counsel on both sides.

( 2 ) THE question raised in this Civil Revision Petition relates to theadmissibilitv of a document dated 6-6-1984 which is styled as " andandand> and s^dj^tfea S5le$o3bo " (relinquishment deed) in evidence. The facts leading to the revision may be briefly stated.

( 3 ) THE petitioners herein are the defendants in O. S. No. 66 of 1992 on the file of the Court of the District Munsif, Medchal, Rangareddy District. The said suit is filed by the first respondent herein for declaration of title and for recovery of possession of the suit schedule property consisting of about 473 Sq. yards of site. The said property originally belonged to Asha ramanujam, the husband of the first petitioner and the father of the second petitioner. He sold the property to the first respondent herein under two sale deeds dated 30-7-1979 and 4-11-1981. However, some disputes arose between the parties in regard to the same. Thereupon the first respondent filed O. S. 47 of 1983 against Ramanujam for declaration of title and injunction. During the pendency of that suit, there was a compromise or settlement of the dispute on 6-6-1984. As per the sa






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top