SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(AP) 881

Andhra Pradesh High Court
Judges : BILAL NAZKI, U.C.BENERJEE
SUPERINTENDENT CENTRAL PRISON, CHENCHALGUDA, HYDERABAD - Appellant
Versus
C.NARSIMHULU - Respondent
Decided On : 12-02-98

Headnote:AP BORSTAL SCHOOL ACT, 1925 - - Secs2(1), 8, 10 & 11 - Accused aged less than 21 years at the time of his conviction u/S302 IPC - Accused filed Writ Petition against orders of Government rejecting his claim under the Act - Single Judge directed to transfer accused to Borstal School - Court is duty bound to conduct an enquiry and if it find that person accused before it, is between age of 16 & 21, Court has no option but to send him to Borstal School - In case of a convict who has been sentenced to life imprisonment and whose case is not considered by Court, he deserves a consideration by State Government - No enquiry has been conducted at any stage to come to conclusion with regard to correct age of accused on date of his conviction - Accused has shown on the basis of his school certificate that he was within the age of 16 and 21 and is entitled to relief under the Act - It is generally assumed that date of birth as given in School leaving Certificate is genuine - Authorities failed to consider importance of Certificate and even decide not to make mention of it in impugned order - Courts have power and jurisdiction to direct transfer of prisoner to Borstal School - Judgement passed by learned Single Judge upheld - Writ appeal dismissed

BILAL NAZKI, J.

( 1 ) THE respondent was convicted under Section 302 I. P. C. and sentenced to life imprisonment by the Trial Court on 19-12-1995 in S. C. No. 245/1991. This sentence was upheld by the High Court in Crl. Appeal No. 41/96 by judgment dated 3rd December, 1996 and the respondent is in custody undergoing the sentence. He filed a writ petition being W. P. No. 3148/97 before this Court- seeking a direction from this Court that he should be sent to Borstal School in terms of the provisions of A. P. Borstal Schools Act, 1925 (hereinafter referred as the Act ) as he was above 16 years and less than 21 years in age at the time of his conviction. This writ petition was decided by this Court on 10-2-1997. It appears that the Court ordered the respondents / appellants herein to consider the representation of the petitioner/respondent herein with regard 3to his claim that he was entitled to benefit under the Act. The representation was decided by the Government by an order dated 19th November, 1997. By this order the request of the respondent was rejected and he challenged the order by way of Writ Petition No. 35131/97. The learned single Judge has allowed the writ petition and directed the Superintendent, Central Prison, chenchalguda, Hyderabad to transfer the writ petitioner to Borstal School at Nizamabad. The judgment of the learned single Judge allowing the writ petition has been challenged by way of this Writ Appeal.

( 2 ) WE have heard the learned Counsel for the parties at length and also gone through the record.

( 3 ) BEFORE coming to the controversy in issue it will be profitable to note down certain provisions of the Act. Under Section 2 (1) of the Act, adolescent offender has been defined as under :"2. (1) adolescent offender means any person who has been convicted of any offence punishable with imprisonment or who having been ordered to give security under Section 106 or Section 118 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has failed to do so and who at the time of such conviction or failure to give security is not less than 16 and not more than 21 years of age;"section 8 lays down the power of the Court to pass sentence of detention in borstal School. "8. Power of Court to pass sentence of detention in Borstal School - Where it appears to a Court having jurisdiction under this Act that an adolescent offender should, by reason of his criminal habits or tendencies, or association with persons of bad character, be subject to detention for such term and under such instruction and discipline as appears most conducive to his reformation and the repression of crime, it shall be lawful for the Court, in lieu of passing a sentence of imprisonment, to pass a sentence of detention in a Borstal School for a term which shall not be less than two years and shall not exceed five years but inno case extending beyond the date on which the adolescent offender will, in the opinion of the Court, attain the age of twenty-three years. "section 10 gives powers to the Inspector-General to transfer prisoners to Borstal school. "10. Power of Inspector-General to transfer prisoners to Borstal School: the Inspector General may, subject to rules made by the State government, if satisfied that any adolescent offender undergoing imprisonment in consequence of a sentence passed either before or after the passing of this Act might with advantage be detained in a Borstal school, direct that such person shall be transferred from prison to Borstal school, there to serve the whole or any part of the unexpired residue of his sentence. The provisions of this Act shall thereupon apply to such person as if he had been originally sentenced to detention in a Borstal school. "section 10-A gives power to State Government to transfer offenders sentenced to transportation to Borstal School. Section 10-A. Power of State Government to transfer offenders sentenced to transportation to Borstal Schools:the State Government may, if satisfied that any offender who ha





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top