SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(AP) 892

C.V.N.SASTRY
Lokam Ramachandra Rao – Appellant
Versus
Bank of Baroda – Respondent


C. V. N. SASTRY, J.

( 1 ) HEARD the learned Counsel on both sides.

( 2 ) THE first defendant is the appellant. The suit was filed by the first respondent, Bank of Baroda, Guntur Branch, for recovery of a sum of Rs. 22,295. 55 being the amount due towards the loan sanctioned by the plaintiff to the first defendant for the purchase of a tractor. The second defendant was the guarantor. The amount of loan sanctioned was Rs. 34,000. 00. The first defendant executed a demand promissory note for the said amount in favour of the Bank. He also executed a hypothecation bond hypothecating the tractor. For due repayment of the loan with interest, costs and other charges, the first defendant has also executed the registered mortgage deed dated 4-5-1974 mortgaging the properties shown in the schedule. It appears that the second defendant subsequently took over the tractor from the first defendant and sold away the tractor. The second defendant made certain payments to the plaintiff-bank towards the loan. As the balance was not paid, the suit was filed. An ex parte decree was initially passed on 18-6-1983. But the same was set aside on 14-7-1997 on an application filed by the first defendant and t














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top