SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(AP) 929

BILAL NAZKI
SHAIK RAMJAN – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


BILAL NAZKI, J.

( 1 ) THERE were four accused in Crime No. 13/93 registered under secs. 366-A and 372 I. P. C. Two accused, being A-3 and A-4 were absconding, the charge was split and A-1 and A-2 were tried after committal. They were tried by Assistant Sessions judge, Eluru. A-1 was convicted for the offence under Section 366-A. I. P. C and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment of ten years with fine of Rs. 200/-, in default of payment of fine she had to suffer further simple imprisonment for three months. She was also convicted for the offence under Section 372 I. P. C. and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment of ten years with fine of Rs. 200/- and in default of payment of fine she was sentenced to suffer simple imprisonment for three months. A-2 was acquitted,

( 2 ) HEARD the learned Counsel for the appellant as well as the learned Publicprosecutor and the record was examined.

( 3 ) THE Prosecution levelled the following allegations against the accused:the de facto complainant Afzalunnisa alms Puthli Begum is the mother of the victim Shaik Ashia. She is resident of Tangellamudi, Eluru town. A-1 is also resident of the same area. A-2 is resident of Nawabpet, Eluru and he is working as N















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top