P.VENKATRAMA REDDY, BILAL NAZKI
Union of India, Dept. of Telecommunications, New Delhi – Appellant
Versus
Secretary, Revenue Dept. , (CTII), Government Of A. P. – Respondent
( 1 ) SHOW-CAUSE notices were issued to the petitioners by the respondents as they were treated to be dealers within the meaning of provisions of A. P. General Sales Tax Act, 1957. After show-cause notices, demands were raised for the year 1996-97 against the petitioners on the basis of provisional assessment orders. In respect of petitioners in WP No. 25864 of 1997 show-cause notice was issued in proceedings No. 9997/96-97/apgst, dated 8-8-1997. Assessment order was passed vide Rc. No. 9997/96-97/apgst, dated 9-9-1997 and the Demand notice was issued on 9-9-1997.
( 2 ) WITH respect to petitioners in WP No. 11826 of 1997 show-cause notice was issued in proceedings No. 9997/96-97/apgst dated 3-2-1997, Provisional Assessment Order was passed in proceedings No. 9997/ 96-97/apgst, dated 25-2-1997. The petitioners in this writ petition moved an appeal which was rejected by the appellate authority and they filed a revision and the Additional Commissioner (CT) and Joint Commissioner (Illegal) who was the revisional authority granted stay on the disputed tax but subject to payment of Rs. 50 lakhs.
( 3 ) IN another Writ Petition i. e. , WP No. 6742 of 1996 show-cause notices
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.