SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(AP) 921

P.VENKATRAMA REDDY, BILAL NAZKI
Union of India, Dept. of Telecommunications, New Delhi – Appellant
Versus
Secretary, Revenue Dept. , (CTII), Government Of A. P. – Respondent


BILAL NAZKI, J.

( 1 ) SHOW-CAUSE notices were issued to the petitioners by the respondents as they were treated to be dealers within the meaning of provisions of A. P. General Sales Tax Act, 1957. After show-cause notices, demands were raised for the year 1996-97 against the petitioners on the basis of provisional assessment orders. In respect of petitioners in WP No. 25864 of 1997 show-cause notice was issued in proceedings No. 9997/96-97/apgst, dated 8-8-1997. Assessment order was passed vide Rc. No. 9997/96-97/apgst, dated 9-9-1997 and the Demand notice was issued on 9-9-1997.

( 2 ) WITH respect to petitioners in WP No. 11826 of 1997 show-cause notice was issued in proceedings No. 9997/96-97/apgst dated 3-2-1997, Provisional Assessment Order was passed in proceedings No. 9997/ 96-97/apgst, dated 25-2-1997. The petitioners in this writ petition moved an appeal which was rejected by the appellate authority and they filed a revision and the Additional Commissioner (CT) and Joint Commissioner (Illegal) who was the revisional authority granted stay on the disputed tax but subject to payment of Rs. 50 lakhs.

( 3 ) IN another Writ Petition i. e. , WP No. 6742 of 1996 show-cause notices























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top