Andhra Pradesh High Court
Judges : VAMAN RAO
K.LAXMAN RAO - Appellant
Versus
State OF A.P. - Respondent
Decided On : 12-31-98
Indian Penal Code,1860- Sections 375 ,376 - S. C. and S. T (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Section 3 (1) (xii) - Appeal Against Conviction - Rape Case - Accused is a resident of and was a Supervisor-cum-Contractor in M/s. B. G. Shirke and company Limited C. C. C - Victim was said to be a minor girl of years - Due to financial problems of family after death of her father she went to C. C. C. and worked on daily wages as a cooli under control of accused - She stayed with her elder sister at during may - During this period accused by virtue of his position as a Supervisor-cum-Contractor who could provide daily work to victim and to her brother-in-law established an affair with victim - It is stated that accused promised to marry her and provide her with daily work - He persuaded victim to have sexual intercourse with him - After two months in victim returned to her village and stayed with her mother accused visited her village frequently and on pretext of securing work for her stayed in house of victim and continued his sexual relations with her - It is stated that victim became pregnant - During victim had taken admission in Z. P. P. Secondary school continue her studies and was admitted in Government scheduled Caste Girls Hostel and was staying in hostel - During that period she was found to be pregnant - Whether at relevant time was under years of age? - Whether prosecution has succeeded in proving that victim was under years of age?- Held, prosecution relies on evidence of certificate of date of birth of issued by Head -Mistress of Government junior College - Under Section 35 of Evidence Act an entry in any public or other official book register or record stating a fact in issue or relevant fact and made by a public servant in discharge of his official duty or by any other person in performance of a duty specially enjoined by law of country in which such book register or record is kept is itself a relevant fact - IT is therefore obvious that fact of victim being under years of age has to be proved with same standard of proof as is required for proving any other ingredient of offence - In this case a certified extract from original register of admissions at has not been produced - Even certified extract from admission register in school at where subsequently studied has not been produced - What is produced is a mere certificate issued by Head - Mistress purporting to be based on school records - There is no specific evidence as on what date returned from and on what date she joined company in collieries where accused was Supervisor-cum-Contractor and started living in house of or any other prosecution witness has not deposed on this aspect - There is no specific evidence given by as to how many days after she came into contact with accused her sexual affair started - In absence of specific evidence in this regard it is not possible to hold that accused started sexual intercourse with when she was under years of age - Appeal Allowed
( 2 ) THE facts relating to this appeal may be stated briefly as follows: The victim Chunarker Radha is the daughter of one Mangaiah resident of chandravalli and she belongs to Scheduled Caste. The accused is a resident of Dhanoor and was a Supervisor-cum-Contractor in M/s. B. G. Shirke and company Limited, C. C. C. Naspoor. The victim was said to be a minor girl of 14 years. Due to financial problems of the family after the death of her father, she went to C. C. C. Nasapoor and worked on daily wages as a cooli under the control of the accused. She stayed with her elder sister at Naspoor during may, 1989 to July, 1989. During this period the accused by virtueof his position as a Supervisor-cum-Contractor who could provide daily work to the victim and to her brother-in-law Jangama Jogaiah established an affair with the victim. It is stated that the accused promised to marry her and provide her with daily work. Thus he persuaded the victim to have sexual intercourse with him. After two months in 1989, the victim returned to her village and stayed with her mother, the accused visited her village frequently and on the pretext of securing work for her stayed in the house of the victim P. W. 1 and continued his sexual relations with her. It is stated that the victim became pregnant. During 1990-91 the victim had taken admission in Z. P. P. Secondary school, Kagaznagar to continue her studies and was admitted in Government scheduled Caste Girls Hostel, Kagaznagar and was staying in the hostel. During that period she was found to be pregnant. The police Kagaznagar was informed of it. On the complaint of P. W. 1, the victim, the C. I. of Police registered a case in Cr. No. 14/90 under Section 376 IPC, issued F. I. R and took up investigation. Subsequently, charge-sheet was filed under Section 376 IPC and for an offence under Section 3 (1) (xii) of S. Cs. and S. Ts. (Prevention of atrocities) Act, 1989 as the victim belonged to Scheduled Caste.
( 3 ) IN support of the case of the prosecution, the victim Radha has been examined as P. W. 1, her father Chunarker Babu has been examined as P. W. 2, the brother-in-law of the victim Jangama Jogaiah has been examined as P. W. 3. Durgam Shivaram, a resident of Chandravalli Village to which P. Ws. 1 and 2 belong has been examined as P. W. 4, P. W. 5, the Head Mistress of Junior college, Kagaznagar where the victim studied has been examined to prove the date of birth certificate of P. W. 1 marked as Ex. P-2. P. W. 6 Razia Sulthana is the Matron of the Scheduled Caste Hostel where P. W. 1 stayed from 26-7-1990 for a period of six days. P. W. 7 Dr. K. Sankarnarayana examined P. W. 1 and after physical, dental and radiological examination he gave certificate of age of the victim under Ex. P-3. The accused denied the allegations against him. On behalf of the accused D. W. I has been examined.
( 4 ) P. W. 1 in her evidence stated that when she was studying 8th class invijayanagaram her father expired. She stopped her studies and returned to her native place Chandravalli. Her sister Jangama Kamala and her husband p. W. 3 Jangama Jogaiah were working as labourers in Naspoor area. She also went and joined them to work as a labourer. While she was attending to the work in a stone crushing machine, she got acquainted with the accused who was the Supervisor-cum-Contractor and who used to pay their wages every week. She worked there for two months.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.