( 1 ) RULE nisi Smt. Nanda, learned Standing Counsel, took notice for the respondents. With the consent of the learned Counsel for both the parties, the writ petition was heard finally.

( 2 ) THE petitioner joined the service of the respondent-Corporation asconductor on 19-1-1985. While serving as such, he became disabled, in the sense, he lost vision of both the eyes and became disabled to perform the duties and functions attached to the post of Conductor. Therefore, the petitioner sought alternative employment in the establishment of the Corporation. Since there was no positive response from the management, the petitioner on earlier occasion, filed W. P. No. 24095 of 1996 and the said writ petition was disposed of on 11-9-1997 holding that the petitioner is entitled to pursue review remedy provided under the Regulations, and thereafterwards, the reviewing authority under the Regulations viz. , Vice-Chairman and Managing Director, considered the claim of the petitioner and rejected his claim by the impugned proceedings dated 18-4-1998. Hence this writ petition assailing the validity of the proceedings of the Vice-Chairman and Managing Director dated 18-4-1998. The c