SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(AP) 264

Y.V.NARAYANA
Nadikatla Narayana Swamy – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


Y. V. NARAYANA, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision petition is filed against the order dated 2-8-1997 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Rajam, in an unnumbered appeal in Gr. No. 2198/1996.

( 2 ) APPELLANTS before the lower appellate Court arc the petitioners herein. They filed O. S. No. 384/1987 seeking declaration of their title and for a consequential permanent injunction restraining the defendants therein or their subordinates, men or agents from entering into the plaint schedule site or from in any manner interfering with their possession and enjoyment of the same. The suit was valued for the purpose of payment of Court-fee at Rs. 750. 00 and accordingly a Court-fee of Rs. 83. 50 was paid under Section 24 (b) read with Schedule 1 Article 1 (b) and (c) of A. P. Court Fees and Suit Valuation Act, 1956. Subsequently, the suit was tried and the same was ultimately dismissed by the trial Court. Aggrieved by the said judgment of dismissal, the plaintiffs filed the present appeal before the learned Subordinate Judge, Rajam. The appellate Court before registration of the appeal, assessed the market value of the suit schedule property at Rs. 9,000. 00 as on the date of filing of the suit and






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top