SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(AP) 246

S.V.MARUTHI, T.N.C.RANGA RAJAN
SYED RAHAMTULLAH KHADRI – Appellant
Versus
Government Of A. P. rep. by its Secretary, Law (LA and J) DEPARTMENT, HYDERABAD – Respondent


T. N. C. RANGARAJAN, J.

( 1 ) THIS writ petition relates to the claim of the petitioner for appointment to the post of the District and Sessions Judge (Grade-II)

( 2 ) THE petitioner is an advocate. He states that he obtained the degree inbachelor of Law in 1989 and enrolled as an advocate with the Bar Council of Andhra Pradesh on 22-06-1989. He claims to have setup practice atchirala by joining the office of Sri R. V. Raghavaiah, Advocate, practising at Chirala. he also states that he obtained M. L. Degree after obtaining permission from bar Council. The petitioner applied for the post of District and Sessions Judge (Grade-II) on 21-08-1996, wrote the test on 24-11-1996 and appeared for the interview on 18-11-1997. He was asked by the Government by a Memo dated 05-06-1997 to furnish certain particulars in the attestation form which he complied with. However, he came across G. O. Ms. No. 291 (LA and JSCF) department dated 04-12-1997 appointing four advocates as District Judges but his name was not in the list. He claimed that he was recommended by the High Court but was not appointed by the Government and therefore filed the writ petition for a Mandamus directing the 1st respondent-G






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top