SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(AP) 321

D.REDDAPPA REDDY, K.B.SIDDAPPA
P. ANURADHA REDDY – Appellant
Versus
P. Kalpana Teacher, Central School, GOLCONDA, HYDERABAD – Respondent


D. REDDEPPA REDDI, J.

( 1 ) THESE three writ petitions have been directed against the order dt. 6-2-1988 of the A. P Administrative Tribunal in OA No. 8037/97, setting aside the selections madeby the A. P. College Service Commission, Hyderabad (for short the Commission ) to the posts of B. Ed, Lecturers pursuant to advertisement no. 5/97dt 14-7-1997 atthe instance of the first respondent, viz. ,smt. Kalpana (the applicant in OA No. 8037/97 hereinafter referred to as the applicant) and directing the Commission to Consider her case for appointment to the post of Lecturer (B. Ed. ,) in case she comes up for selection according to merit and if she is otherwise eligible and qualified for appointment. W. P. Nos. 5039 and 6298 of 1998 have been filed by the selected candidates with the leave of this court as they have not been impleaded as respondents in OA No. 8037/97 and W. P. No. 5706/98 has been filed by the Commission.

( 2 ) WE shall, in brief, state the facts that led to the filing of these writ petitions. The Commission by its advertisement No. 5/97 dt. 14-7-1997 invited applications for the posts of Lecturers in Education as well as other disciplines. In the cases on hand we are














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top