SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(AP) 315

B.S.RAIKOTE
Gatlameedi Pothanna – Appellant
Versus
Divisional Forest Officer, Nirmal, Adilabad District – Respondent


B. S. RAIKOTE, J.

( 1 ) THIS writ petition is filed for a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order directing the respondent to return/release the bank guarantee of Rs. 70,800/- and Rs. 1,08,000/- of State Bank of India, Nirmal and also directing the respondent to return the security deposit of Rs. 3,000/- and rs. 40,000/- deposited by the petitioners through their G. P. A. holder.

( 2 ) IN the affidavit of the petitioners stated that they are the owners and pattadars of the land bearing Sy. Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4 situated in Lonkapadu village of Mamada Mandal and the lands are classified as agricultural Dry patta Lands as per the proceedings of the Divisional Forest Officer, Nirmal in No. B/853/91 dated 11-10-1991. When the petitioners applied for permission for felling the trees, existing in the said land bearing Sy. Nos. 1 to 4, the conservator of Forests, Adilabad circle vide order dated 17-6-1992 accorded permission to fell the trees in the said land covering an extent of Ac. 30. 45 cents with certain conditions that the petitioners should keep security deposit of Rs. 3,000/- with Divisional Forest Officer and the transportation of the same should be completed withi










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top