SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(AP) 316

P.RAMAKRISHNAM RAJU, Y.V.NARAYANA
KANUKOLANU VIMALA – Appellant
Versus
S. LAKSHMANA RAO – Respondent


P. RAMAKRISHNAM RAJU, J.

( 1 ) THE plaintiff is the appellant herein, who filed the suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale dated 15-6-1996. According to her the 1st respondent offered to sell an extent of Ac. 4. 95 cents in R. S. Nos. 306/3 and 307 of Nandigama Village for a consideration of Rs. 3,95,400/- and the appellant agreed to purchase the same on 15-6-1996 and paid the entire consideration. The said agreement was attested by the wife of the 1st respondent and possession was also delivered to her on that date. Ever since, she was in possession and enjoyment of the same. As the 1st respondent is trying to evade the execution of sale deed and he is making attempts to trespass into the plaint schedule land she filed the suit. Pending the suit she filed LA. No. 729 of 1997 on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Machilipatnam for a temporary injunction. As the said application was dismissed, this appeal is filed.

( 2 ) IN the agreement respondents 2 and 3, who are minor unmarried daughters of the 1st respondent were also parties and being minors they are represented by their father, the 1st respondent. Respondents 2 and 3 in their counter affidavit denied t








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top