SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(AP) 311

S.S.HUSSAINI, UMESH C.BANERJEE
Government Of A. P. , PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HIGHER EDUCATION DEPT. HYDERABAD – Appellant
Versus
J. B. EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, HYDERABAD – Respondent


SYED SAADATULLA HUSSAINI, J.

( 1 ) THESE three writ appeals arise against the common judgment of the learned single Judge, dated 4-12-1997 allowing the Writ Petition Nos. 27598/1997, 27612/1997 and 27617/1997, holding that Section 20 of the A. P. Education Act, 1982 (hereinafter referred to as "state Act") insofar it relates to establishment of Technical Institutions viz. , Engineering Colleges and other connected matters, as it overlaps and repugnant to Section 10 of the All India Council for Technical Education Act, 1987 (hereinafter referred to as "central Act ) and the Regulations framed thereunder; as such void and unenforceable, and directing the Convenor (EAMCET-1997 - Engineering Admissions) to allot the candidates to the respondents-writ petitioners-Institutions forthwith in accordance with the Rules for the Academic year 1997-98 subject to grant of affiliation by the concerned University.

( 2 ) THE factual matrix of the case in the above appeals is that respondents-writ petitioners have applied, after fulfilling the terms and conditions laid down under the provisions of the Central Act for establishing Engineering colleges and imparting education in different disciplines



























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top