SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(AP) 60

P.B.MISHRA, S.PARVATHA RAO
G. Yadaiah – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


( 1 ) I am not inclined to allow this petition for release of the petitioners on bail.

( 2 ) THE learned Additional Sessions Judge at Mahabubnagar by his order dated 30-12-1996 dismissed a similar petition for bail in Crl. M. P. No. 1407 of 1997 observing that "the petitioners were found in possession of 700 grams of Diazepam and also Chloral Hydrate". I am of the same view. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. However, in view of the letter of the Superintendent, District Jail, Mahabubnagar dated 24-1-1997 addressed to the learned Additional Sessions Judge at Mahabubnagar, I make it clear that it will be open to the 1st petitioner to move for bail afresh before the Sessions Court concerned.

( 3 ) BEFORE closing I have to deal with certain unfortunate and unpalatable aspects brought out in the hearing of this matter.

( 4 ) WHEN this petition came before me on 17-1-1997 it was noticed that a typed copy of remand report was filed without the matter "written on the overleaf giving the particulars of the seized property", and I observed as follows :"it is most unfortunate that the learned counsel has not placed before this Court, the matter written on the overleaf of the remand rep










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top