SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(AP) 66

P.RAMAKRISHNAM RAJU
Ajru Nagarathnam – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner, Survey, Settlements and land Records, A. P. , Hyderabad – Respondent


P. RAMACHANDRA RAJU, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner is the owner having possession of an extent of Ac. 4-77 cents of land of Muppinavarigudem (Nagavaram Mutha), hamlet of Buttayagudem, buttayagudem Mandal, West Godavari District. The said land originally was a part of Gutalat estate. Thonam Ramudu and Juttuga Subbaiah were cultivating this land. Zamindarini granted patta to the said cultivators on 1-7-1905. They partitioned the land between themselves and Ac. 4-77 cents of land has fallen to the share of Thonam Ramudu. After his death, his wife narasamma conveyed the said land to the father of the petitioner under all gift deed dated 9-3-1943. The petitioner s father cultivated the land during his life time and executed a gift deed on a stamped paper bequeathing the said land as marriage gift (Pasupukunkuma) to the petitioner. From 27-4-1995 the petitioner has been in continuous possession and enjoyment of the said land. In fact, the Special Deputy Collector (T. W), K. R. Puram on the complaint of the Special Deputy Tahsildar (T. W.) II, K. R. Puram enquired into the matter under Section 3 (2) (a) of A. P. Scheduled Area Land Transfer Regulation of 1959 as amended by Regulation 1 of 1970,







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top