SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(AP) 154

MOTILAL B.NAIK, S.PARVATHA RAO
Balaji Dhal and Flour Mill, Tenali – Appellant
Versus
APSEB, Hyderabad – Respondent


S. PARVATHA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner questions Condition No. 42. 3 of the Terms and Conditions of Supply of electrical Energy by the Andhra Pradesh state Electricity Board ("the Conditions" for short) as ultra vires the powers of the board and as unreasonable, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of india and contends that, therefore, the notice in Lr. No. AE/o/d2/gnl/f. No. Dis/d. No. 1028/92, dated 5-2-1992 issued by the 2nd Respondent herein i. e. , Assistant engineer, Operation, D. 2, A. P. S. E. B. , Tenali, is illegal. He seeks a writ of mandamus restraining the Respondents 1 and 2 from disconnecting Service Connection No. 8192 of Tenali at the instance of the 3rd respondent.

( 2 ) IN the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition he states that he is the Managing partner of the petitioner-firm and that the 3rd Respondent and six others are owners of sri Lakshmi Narayana Rice, Dhal and Flour mill at Tenali, who is owning two mills - one a rice mill and the other a dhal and flour mill - and that both are situated in the same building, though in different portions of it. He states that the dhal and flour mill was leased to the petitioner-firm and t












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top