K. S. SHRIVASTAV, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision is directed against the judgment passed by the Principal subordinate Judge, Ranga Reddy District at Saroor Nagar, Hyderabad in Small cause Suit No. 7 of 1995 dated 08-8-1996 whereby the suit for recovery of rs. 5,000/- with simple interest at the rate of 6% per annum has been decreed against the petitioner-defendant.

( 2 ) THE respondent-plaintiff filed a suit for recovery of Rs. 5,000/- on the basis of the receipt Ex. A-1 dated 05-09-1990. The petitioner-defendant has specifically denied to have executed the receipt Ex. A.-1 and has pleaded that it is a forged document.

( 3 ) THE trial Court observing that the petitioner-defendant did not examine the hand writing expert in an attempt to prove that the receipt Ex. A-1 is a forged document, compared the admitted signatures of the petitioner-defendant on his Vakalat with the disputed signature on the document Ex. A-1 and reached the conclusion that the signature of the person on Ex. A-1 is similar to the signature of the petitioner-defendant in his Vakalat and concluded that the petitioner-defendant has executed the document Ex. A-1 in favour of the respondent-plaintiff and decreed the suit as

Click Here to Read the rest of this document