SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(AP) 230

M.N.RAO
Y. Parthasarathy – Appellant
Versus
General Manager, Railway Electrification, Allahabad – Respondent


M. N. RAO, J.

( 1 ) BY this application filed under Section 11 (5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short "the New Act"), the petitioner, a registered partnership firm represented by its Managing Director, is praying for appointment of a sole arbitrator by the Honourable Chief Justice or any other person or institution designated by the Honourable Chief Justice. In compliance with the direction issued by the Honourable Chief Justice, the matter was listed before me.

( 2 ) THE claims in respect of which arbitration is sought are of the value of Rs. 1,16,18,336/ -.

( 3 ) BY an agreement dated 7-10-1991 concluded between the General Manager, Railway Electrification Central Organisation, Allahabad and the petitioner, construction of Electric Loco Shed and its ancillary works in Lalaguda, Secunderabad, was entrusted to the petitioner and the work was required to be completed within two years - from 3-6-1991 to 2-6-1993. The estimated value of the contract was Rs. 2,45,11,415. 45. It is stated that subsequently, from time to time, certain additional works also were entrusted to the petitioner and the total value of the works entrusted to the petitioner was Rs. 3,45,11,41










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top