B. SUDERSHAN REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THE unsuccessful writ petitioners are the appellants in this writ appeal. The writ petition is purported to have been filed by them in public interest. They have prayed for issuance of an appropriate writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st Respondent-Principal subordinate Judge, Vijayawada to decide O. P. No. 350 of 1987 and O. P. No. 67 of 1988 on merits by considering the contentions and the evidence, if any, adduced by the parties by setting aside the docket order dated 22-3-1996 in the said O. Ps. Factual Matrix:

( 2 ) ACCORDING to the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the dispute relate to payment of compensation for the land situated in N. T. S. No. 368/3a admeasuring an extent of Ac. 1-65 cents and land admeasuring an extent of Ac. 2-88 cents in N. T. S. No. 368/3a situated in moghalrajapuram of Vijayawada Urban Mandal of Krishna District. It is alleged that the compensation amount for the land was likely to be paid to the 3rd Respondent herein, though he is not the real owner of the land in qaestion. According to the petitioners, the land in question is the Government lan

Click Here to Read the rest of this document