SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(AP) 404

B.S.A.SWAMY
R. Sudhakar – Appellant
Versus
Indian Immunologicals, Hyd. – Respondent


B. S. A. SWAMY, J.

( 1 ) THIS Court is called upon to decide whether the action of the respondent in transfering the petitioner who is working as Deputy Manager (Personnel and administration) as Officer on Special Duty, with effect from 03-04-1995 vide his proceedings No. II:adm:63:95, dated 14th march, 1995 and in directing him to assist marketing, Accounts and Purchase departments on the matters enumerated in his proceedings No. IIL:9. 1:019;051, dated 10/11-04-1995 is legal and sustainable in law.

( 2 ) BY order dated 07-02-97, I directed the respondent Corporation to produce the advertisement said to have been issued in the year 1979, pursuant to which the petitioner was selected and was given posting as Personnel and Administrative Officer by the respondent Corporation in its proceedings ref. No. HYD: II: PER: 2535a, dated 30-09-1982. In Memo dated 2nd December, 1995, the corporation stated that the file is not available in the office in the following terms:"a copy of the advertisement issued in the year 1979 against which the petitioner was recruited for the post of Assistant executive (P and A), not traced, since the file pertaining to advertisement in the year 1979-80 not tr



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top