SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(AP) 389

N.Y.HANUMANTHAPPA, T.N.C.RANGA RAJAN
Koyya Veeraju – Appellant
Versus
Mandal Revenue Officer, Gollaprolu, E. G. Dist. – Respondent


N. Y. HANUMANTHAPPA, J.

( 1 ) ). BJECT matter involved in these two writ petitions is common and parties are also common. As such both the petitions are clubbed together and disposed of by a common order.

( 2 ) W. P. NO. 3039 of 1989 is filed seeking for the relief that a Writ of Mandamus be granted declaring the action of the respondents as illegal and further direct them to mutate the names of the petitioners in revenue records as per the ryotwari Patta Certificate issued under Section 11 (a) of the Act XXVI of 1948 issued by the Settlement Officer, Visakhapatnam in R. P. No. 275 of 1962 dated 30-4-1963 and to grant such other relief.

( 3 ) RELIEF sought in W. P. No. 13648 of 1991 is to issue Writ of Certiorari to quash the show cause notice issued by the Director of Settlements, Andhra pradesh, Hyderabad in R. P. No. 159/91 dated 12-8-1991 and further to declare his action in suo motu exercising the power under Section 5 (2) of the Act 26 of 1948 after a lapse of 28 years against the orders of the Settlement Officer passed in R. P. No. 275/62 dated 30-4-1963 as illegal and without jurisdiction and further to direct the authorities to mutate the names of the petitioners in the re

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top