N.Y.HANUMANTHAPPA, T.N.C.RANGA RAJAN
Koyya Veeraju – Appellant
Versus
Mandal Revenue Officer, Gollaprolu, E. G. Dist. – Respondent
( 1 ) ). BJECT matter involved in these two writ petitions is common and parties are also common. As such both the petitions are clubbed together and disposed of by a common order.
( 2 ) W. P. NO. 3039 of 1989 is filed seeking for the relief that a Writ of Mandamus be granted declaring the action of the respondents as illegal and further direct them to mutate the names of the petitioners in revenue records as per the ryotwari Patta Certificate issued under Section 11 (a) of the Act XXVI of 1948 issued by the Settlement Officer, Visakhapatnam in R. P. No. 275 of 1962 dated 30-4-1963 and to grant such other relief.
( 3 ) RELIEF sought in W. P. No. 13648 of 1991 is to issue Writ of Certiorari to quash the show cause notice issued by the Director of Settlements, Andhra pradesh, Hyderabad in R. P. No. 159/91 dated 12-8-1991 and further to declare his action in suo motu exercising the power under Section 5 (2) of the Act 26 of 1948 after a lapse of 28 years against the orders of the Settlement Officer passed in R. P. No. 275/62 dated 30-4-1963 as illegal and without jurisdiction and further to direct the authorities to mutate the names of the petitioners in the re
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.