SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(AP) 396

R.M.BAPAT
Iruvanti Gopinatha Rao (died) – Appellant
Versus
Vadlapudi Narayana – Respondent


R. M. BAPAT, J.

( 1 ) THE 1st appellant herein named iruvanti Gopinatha Rao was the plaintiff in O. S. No. 12 of 1989 filed by him in the Court of the Subordinate Judge, sathupally, Khammam District against the defendants-respondents herein. The suit was filed by the plaintiff for declaration that he is the owner and possessor of Ac. 26-17 guntas of dry land situated in Sy. Nos. 404, 405 and 406 at Rayudupalem village, Hamlet of Ammapalem, erstwhile Sathupalli Taluk of Khammam District, which is the suit schedule property. On-evidence, the learned Subordinate Judge dismissed the suit of the plaintiff. Aggrieved by the aforesaid judgment and decree, the first appellant-plaintiff carried the matter in appeal by filing A. S. No. 39 of 1992 in the Court of the Additional district Judge, Khammam. The learned Judge dismissed the appeal filed by the plaintiff-appellant herein, confirming the judgment and decree passed by the trial Court. Aggrieved by the judgment and decree of the first Appellate court, the original plaintiff-1st appellant herein has filed the present appeal.

( 2 ) THE brief averments made in the plaint are as follows: As stated earlier, the plaintiff filed the suit for de

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top