SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(AP) 394

B.SUBHASHAN REDDY, T.RANGA RAO
B. Suresh – Appellant
Versus
Dist. Collector, Nizamabad – Respondent


B. SUBHASHAN REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THIS batch of writ petitions raises an important point for consideration as to whether a notice is necessary before bifurcating the fair-price shops held by the petitioners. The petitioners hold authorisations to run the fair-price shops and specified number of cards are attached to their respective fair-price shops. The Government has framed guidelines for creating or bifurcating fair-price shops and one of the considerations is the population being minimum of 1650 persons for one shop. The Government also formulated a policy that each and every village should have separate fair-price shop, as hitherto, there was one fair-price shop for more than one village. Another guideline is that the fair-price shop should be within a distance of 1 k. m from the residences of the cardholders. May be, there are special circumstances for consideration as to whether a separate shop to Harijan basthi in the village has to be setup. In so far as tribal areas are concerned, even if population is 1000, fair-price shop has to be set up. As already stated above, for non-tribal areas, the population is 1650 for each shop. The other prime consideration is that shop must be e





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top