SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(AP) 465

V.BHASKARA RAO
Thallapakam Ananthacharyulu – Appellant
Versus
Thallapakam Venkata Krishnamacharyulu – Respondent


( 1 ) THIS revision petition is directed against the order in IA. No. 240/1994 in os. No. 254/1984 on the file of Additional Subordinate Judge, Tirupati, dt. 29-11-1995, appointing an Advocate Commissioner under Order XXVI rule 13 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure to divide the plaint schedule property into six equal shares by metes and bounds and for passing a final decree in terms of preliminary decree.

( 2 ) THE facts and circumstances emerging from the contentions of both sides in brief are: the parties herein except respondents 2 and 3 are direct descendants of tallapakam Annmacharya, the great poet and Composer and a well known devotee of Lord Veukateswara. The land bearing S. Nos. 586, 647 and 649 situated at Tirumala Hills admeasuring 28 acres 50 cents was an inam granted by the Emperor of Vijayanagara Sri Krishna Devarayalu to the great poet by title deeds 2920 and 2921. After the enforcement of A. P. (Andhra Area) Inams (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act, 1956, for short the act , the inams Deputy Tahsildar suo-motu passed an order under Section 3 of the Act, dt. 24-1-1960, holding that (i) the land is an inam land; (ii) it is in ryotwari vil





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top