SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(AP) 464

MOTILAL B.NAIK
M. Ranga Reddy – Appellant
Versus
N. Indrasena Reddy – Respondent


MOTILAL B. NAIK, J.

( 1 ) THIS application is filed by the first respondent in the Election petition No. 2 of 1995, under Section 86 (1) of the Representation of the People Act read with Section 151 of C. P. C. seeking to dismiss the Election Petition No. 2 of 1995 on the ground that the copy of the election petition accompanied by supporting affidavit in Form 25, prescribed under rule 94-A of the Conduct of Election rules, 1961 (for short the Rules ) served on him is without the attestation of the magistrate of First Class or a Notary or commissioner of Oaths and is not in accordance with the requirement contemplated under Section 83 (1 ) (c) of the representation of the People Act, 1951 (for short the Act ).

( 2 ) THE applicant Sri M. Ranga Reddy is the returned candidate from 212-Malakpet assembly Constituency for which election was held on 1-12-1994. He contested the election on Telugu Desam Party ticket. The respondent herein - Sri N. Indrasena Reddy unsuccessfully contested the said election on bharatiya Janata Party ticket. Apart from these two candidates, there were several other contestants including the candidate sponsored by the Indian National Congress.

( 3 ) SRI N. I


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top