SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(AP) 571

Y.V.NARAYANA
Om Prakash Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
Joint Collector, Adilabad – Respondent


Y. V. NARAYANA, J.

( 1 ) CHALLENGING the order dated 16-3-1992 in Case No. D4/ta/l/92 of the Joint Collector, who dismissed the appeal filed by the pattedar while confirming the order passed by the Mandal Revenue Officer restoring possession of the land in an extent of Ac. 5. 11 in S. No. 41 of Seethagondi village, gudihathnoor Mandal, in favour of one Devu bai, wife of the original protected tenant thadaka Santhanna, this revision is filed by the pattedar.

( 2 ) THE brief facts of the case are as follows: The 2nd respondent herein (Thadaka pothanna) claiming himself to be the son of the original protected tenant viz. , Thadaka santanna, filed a petition before the primary authority i. e. , Mandal Revenue Officer under section 32 (1) of the A. P. (Telangana Area) tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ) seeking restoration of possession of the land in an extent of Ac. 5. 11 in Survey No. 41 of seethagondi village. The Mandal Revenue officer issued notices to the pattedars, including the petitioner herein viz. , omprakash Agarwal, and conducted an enquiry. During the course of enquiry, the 2nd respondent herein i. e. , Thadka Pothanna filed cert





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top