SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(AP) 556

M.N.RAO, NEELAM SANJIVA REDDY
N. Santhoshi – Appellant
Versus
Station House Officer, I Town Police Station, Mahaboobnagar – Respondent


( 1 ) THE case is taken up in the chambers at 1. 40 p. m. in the presence of the learned Govt. Pleader for Home, the learned Asst. Govt. Pleader representing the learned Advocate General and the learned Counsel for the petitioner.

( 2 ) THE petitioner Smt. Santhoshi and her husband Lakshminarayana are present. The petitioner says that she is a major aged 19 years and that she married Lakshminarayana on 17-6-97 at Dharmasthali. She apprehends danger from her parents to her husband because of the Police complaint lodged by her father which was registered as Crime No. 93/97 and she is fearing that her husband would be arrested and harassed arid that she too would be forcibly taken away by her parents.

( 3 ) PRIMA facie we are satisfied that the petitioner by her appearance is a major.

( 4 ) WE, therefore, direct that in the event of Lakshminarayana petitioner s husband being arrested in connection with Cr. No. 93/97 or any other crime concer allegation of his eloping with the petitioner, he shall be released on bail by the concerned police on his executing a bond in a sum of rs. 5,000/ -.

( 5 ) WE also further direct that the petitioner shall not be arrested by the police and the poli


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top