SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(AP) 591

V.BHASKARA RAO
M. Sireesha – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner, Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan, New Delhi – Respondent


( 1 ) THE petitioners in both these writ petitions are challenging the change of date of reckoning the minimum qualifying age of a child for admission to class-I in Kendriya Vidyalayas from 30th September to 1st April of the academic year and the impugned proceedings in F. No. 19-42 (G) /96-KVS (HR), dated 10-2-1997, as arbitrary, discriminatory, irrational, unjust and void being violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India. As an ancillary relief, a direction is sought for restoration of the status quo ante obtaining prior to the above proceedings.

( 2 ) PETITIONER No. 1 in Writ Petition No. 6116 of 1997 filed her affidavit in support of the writ petition. It is stated that Kendriya Vidyalayas of Central schools are run by Kendriya Vidyalaya Sanghatan, New Delhi, which is an atonomous body constituted by the Ministry of Human Resources development, Government of India, New Delhi, as a result of recommendations of the Second Pay Commission and they are affiliated to the central Board of Secondary Education (for short, C. B. S. E.), New Delhi, with a common syllabus and curriculum of studies. Main objectives of Kendriya vidyalayas are (1) to cater to the educational
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top