N. Y. HANUMANTHAPPA, J.

( 1 ) ). THESE two writ petitions are directed against the order and decree dated 05-03-1990 in L. G. C. No. 32/89 on the file of the Special Court under A. P. Land grabbing (Prohibition) Act, Hyderabad.

( 2 ) SINCE the question involved in both the writ petitions is one and the same they are disposed of by a common order.

( 3 ) ). Respondents 1 to 10 in the Land Grabbing Case No. 32/89 are the petitioners in W. P. No. 4991/90. Respondent No. 11 in LGC No. 32/89 is the petitioner in W. P. No. 4026/90. All the applicants in the said Land Grabbing case are the respondent Nos. 2 to 6 in both the writ petitions. The 11th respondent in the land grabbing case had acted as G. P. A. Holder of respondents 1 to 10. The applicants who are respondents herein filed the said land grabbing case alleging that the petitioners herein are the land grabbers. After discussing the evidence both oral and documentary, the Special Court under A. P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, Hyderabad, hereinafter referred to as the special Court , allowed the case holding the petitioners 1 to 10 in w. P. No. 4991/90 and the petitioner in W. P. No. 4026/90, being the G. P. A. Holder of the pe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document