SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(AP) 645

MAHEMMAD HABEEB SHAMS ANSARI
Nima Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Surjith Singh – Respondent


M. H. S. ANSARI, J.

( 1 ) AGGRIEVED against the order rejecting the application for impleading the unsuccessful petitioner, has filed the above Revision Petition.

( 2 ) THE suit O. S. No. 54 of 1981 has been filed by Respondent No. 1 against respondents 2 and 3 herein in respect of the properties left behind by one santh Singh. Respondent No. 1 claims to be the adopted son of Santh Singh respondent No. 2 - (Jugna Bai) is the second wife of the said Santh Singh and defendant No. 2 in the suit, Respondent No. 3 herein is daughter and is defendant No. 3 in the said suit. The petitioner herein claims to be a foster daughter of the said Santh Singh and entitled to a share in the estate of Santh singh by virtue of a Settlement Deed (Ex. B-2) and therefore claimed to be a necessary and proper party to the suit O. S. No. 54 of 1981. A preliminary decree was passed by the Court on 11-10-1990 and an application I. A. No. 697 of 1993 filed by the plaintiff for passing the final decree is pending adjudication and it is at this stage that the petitioner herein filed I. A. No. 1491 of 1993 for impleading her as a party to the said proceedings which by the order under challenge in the above Civil













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top