N.Y.HANUMANTHAPPA, V.BHASKARA RAO
P. S. R. Subrahmanyam – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Endowments, A. P. Hyderabad – Respondent
( 1 ) AS the question to be considered in all these Writ Petitions is one and the same, they are clubbed together and disposed of by a common order.
( 2 ). The petitioners challenged the competency of the Commissioner (1st respondent) in transferring them from one Institution (Temple) to another nstitution in the State of Andhra Pradesh on the ground that such transfers are illegal and without jurisdiction. The following is the list submitted by the petitioners with regard to their transfers. Sl. No.
W. P. NO.
Petitioner Name
Working in
Transferred to
By Proceeding No.
1.
W. P. No. 11835/97
P. S. R. Subramanyam
Sri Durgamalleswara
Swamy varla Devasthanam,
Vijayawada
Simhachalam
Rc. No. A1/
24393/97-31,
dt. 7-6-97.
2.
W. P. No. 13638/97
P. Veera bhadrarao
"
"
Rc. No. A1/
24393/97-4,
dt. 7-6-97.
3.
W. P. No. 13655/97
C. Durga
Prasad
"
"
Rc. No. A1/
24393/97-63,
dt. 7-6-97.
4.
W. P. No. 13657/97
K. Rama
Rao
"
Annavaram
Rc. No. A1/
24393/97-39,
dt. 7-6-97.
5.
W. P. No. 13660/97
M. Tirumaleswararao
"
Simhachalam
Rc. No. A1/
24393/97-65,
dt. 7-6-97
6.
W. P. No. 13662/97
P. Prasada
Rao
Rc. No. A1/
24393/97-103,
dt. 7-6-97.
7.
W. P. No. 13664/97
G. V. Prasad
Annavaram
Rc. No. A1/
24393/97-71,
dt. 7-6-97.
8.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.