SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(AP) 827

B.S.A.SWAMY
M. Venkanna – Appellant
Versus
District Collector, (Land Acquisition), Khammam – Respondent


B. S. A. SWAMY, J.

( 1 ) IN this writ petition, Proc. L. Dis. "no. Bl/41/96 dated 23-1-1996 issued by the first respondent refusing to reconvey the lands of the petitioner which were acquired for the purpose of construction of buildings and canals of Nagarjuna Sagar Project stating that the lands will be useful to Government for public purposes are assailed.

( 2 ) THIS Court while admitting the writ petition on 27-3-1996 ordered notice. After notice, the matter came up before me on 21-6-1996. Having heard the arguments on both the sides and having noticed that the Government ordered reconveyance of certain lands in its Memo No. 49038/n. S. P. I (2)/91-5 dated 10-3-1995 including the lands belonging to petitioner. I directed the first respondent to be present in the Court along with the concerned files on 8-7-1996 to justify the issuance of the impugned Memo. The first respondent while coming to the Court seemed to have summoned the Superintending Engineer to his office on 7-7-1996 and seemed to have obtained a letter then and there stating that the lands are likely to be needed by the Irrigation Department. The letter is in the form of manuscript and it does not form part of either












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top