SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(AP) 873

S.S.HUSSAINI
State Of A. P. – Appellant
Versus
V. Vishwanath Rao – Respondent


S. S. HUSSAINI, J.

( 1 )

( 2 ) AGGRIEVED by the orders passed in L. R. A. No. 1 of 1995 dated 15-2-1995 by the Land Reforms Appellate Tribunal, Karimnagar, the present C. R. P. is filed

( 3 ) THE learned Government Pleader submits that an application under Rule 16 (5) (b) of the Rules under the A. P. Land Reforms (Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings) Act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been preferred before the Land Reforms Tribunal at Karimnagar to reopen the ceiling case of the respondent and declare him that he is the surplus landholder to an extent equivalent to 0. 6140 Standard Holding on the ground that actually, the total calculations in the verification report comes to 2. 8256 S. H. whereas in the verification report, only an extent of 2. 1428 S. H, was shown and thus an extent of 0. 6828 S. H. was omitted in the computation in respect of the holding of the declarant and termed this as a calculation mistake.

( 4 ) AFTER notice to the respondent, the Land Reforms tribunal examined the case records and the report filed by the Authorised Officer (L. R.) and the original faisal patties of Thummanapalli village and observed that in the verification report, an extent of





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top