S.S.HUSSAINI
State Of A. P. – Appellant
Versus
V. Vishwanath Rao – Respondent
( 1 )
( 2 ) AGGRIEVED by the orders passed in L. R. A. No. 1 of 1995 dated 15-2-1995 by the Land Reforms Appellate Tribunal, Karimnagar, the present C. R. P. is filed
( 3 ) THE learned Government Pleader submits that an application under Rule 16 (5) (b) of the Rules under the A. P. Land Reforms (Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings) Act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been preferred before the Land Reforms Tribunal at Karimnagar to reopen the ceiling case of the respondent and declare him that he is the surplus landholder to an extent equivalent to 0. 6140 Standard Holding on the ground that actually, the total calculations in the verification report comes to 2. 8256 S. H. whereas in the verification report, only an extent of 2. 1428 S. H, was shown and thus an extent of 0. 6828 S. H. was omitted in the computation in respect of the holding of the declarant and termed this as a calculation mistake.
( 4 ) AFTER notice to the respondent, the Land Reforms tribunal examined the case records and the report filed by the Authorised Officer (L. R.) and the original faisal patties of Thummanapalli village and observed that in the verification report, an extent of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.