B.SUDERSHAN REDDY
Ejaz – Appellant
Versus
Government Of A. P. – Respondent
( 1 ) THE petitioner who claims to be a businessman hailing from a respectable family with good background was arrested in the year 1990 during the communal riots under Sections 148,153-A, 323 and 307 IPC r/w Sec. 1491. P. C. The petitioner was enlarged on bail and thereafter he was acquitted of all the charges levelled against him under those sections after a full trial by the learned metropolitan Sessions Judge, City Criminal Court, Hyderabad. The petitioner submits that even after the acquittal of the above cases, the Police of Golconda p. S. became more hostile and started harassing him by calling him to the Police station very frequently disturbing his peace and domestic tranquillity. Later, security proceedings under Section 110 Cr. PC on the allegation that the petitioner had committed breach of peace were initiated against the petitioner, but however, he was discharged of the same.
( 2 ) THE petitioner submits that there are no other cases pending against him and both of them have ended in his favour. The petitioner states that he is not at all habituated to commit or attempt to commit or to abet offences involving breach of peace and in spite of the s
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.