SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(AP) 858

B.SUDERSHAN REDDY
Ejaz – Appellant
Versus
Government Of A. P. – Respondent


B. SUDERSHAN REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner who claims to be a businessman hailing from a respectable family with good background was arrested in the year 1990 during the communal riots under Sections 148,153-A, 323 and 307 IPC r/w Sec. 1491. P. C. The petitioner was enlarged on bail and thereafter he was acquitted of all the charges levelled against him under those sections after a full trial by the learned metropolitan Sessions Judge, City Criminal Court, Hyderabad. The petitioner submits that even after the acquittal of the above cases, the Police of Golconda p. S. became more hostile and started harassing him by calling him to the Police station very frequently disturbing his peace and domestic tranquillity. Later, security proceedings under Section 110 Cr. PC on the allegation that the petitioner had committed breach of peace were initiated against the petitioner, but however, he was discharged of the same.

( 2 ) THE petitioner submits that there are no other cases pending against him and both of them have ended in his favour. The petitioner states that he is not at all habituated to commit or attempt to commit or to abet offences involving breach of peace and in spite of the s














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top