P.RAMAKRISHNAM RAJU, P.S.MISHRA
Special Officer and Competent authority, ULC, Hyderabad – Appellant
Versus
Jyothi Art Studio, a Partnership Firm rep. , by V. Nageswara Rao – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS writ appeal is filed by Special Officer-cum-Competent Authority, urban Land Ceilings, Nampally, questioning the order passed by the learned single Judge, allowing Writ Petition No. 7127 of 1996.
( 2 ) RESPONDENT is a registered firm. It has purchased an extent of 3009. 17 sq. yards of vacant site-equivalent to 252597 sq. metres, from the A. P. Housing board, in public auction held on 28-12-1994 for a consideration of rs. 37,67,330/ -. On receipt of consideration, the A. P. Housing Board, represented by its Estate Officer, executed a registered sale deed bearing document No. 677/95 dated 24-2-1995 in favour of respondent-firm, and accordingly, possession was delivered.
( 3 ) THE respondent-firm, with a view to construct a Cinema Theatre in the above plot of land, approached several authorities, including Hyderabad urban Development Authority (HUDA), seeking no Objection Certificate the HUDA while endorsing no Objection , through its letter dared 9-1-1996, imposed a condition that the clearance is subject to obtaining clearance from the Urban Land Ceilings viz. , the appellant. Accordingly, the respondent-firm approached the appellant by filing d
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.