SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(AP) 897

S.V.MARUTHI
Sunkara Laxmaiah – Appellant
Versus
Vadlapudi Venkateswara Rao – Respondent


S. V. MARUTHI, J.

( 1 ) D- 1 and D-2 are the appellants. The plaintiff is the transferee from D-3 under a pronote dated 2-11-1968. D-3 transferred the pronote in favour of the plaintiff for a sum of Rs. 4,352/- The pronote amount under Ex. A-1 is rs. 3,900/ -. The plaintiff claimed relief under Ex. A-1 by virtue of the transfer under Ex. A-2 against D-l and D-2 executants of the pronote and for an alternate relief against D-3. The District Munsif dismissed the suit of the plaintiff against d-l and D-2 and decreed the suit against D-3. Aggrieved by the same the plaintiff filed an appeal seeking the decree against D-l and D-2. The learned district (sic. Subordinate) Judge set aside the decree passed by the District munsif against D-3 though there was no appeal by D-3, and decreed the suit against D-l and D-2. Aggrieved by the same D-l and D-2 filed the present appeal.

( 2 ) THE facts in brief are as follows: defendants 1 and 2 borrowed an amount of Rs. 3,900/- from the third defendant and executed a pronote on 2-11-1968 at Nuzvid and executed the suit pronote agreeing to pay the same with interest at 6% per annum. The third defendant transferred the said pronote in favour of the plain















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top