SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(AP) 898

K.S.SHRIVASTAVA
Hasmath Bee alias Mehrum Bee – Appellant
Versus
Khatija Bai – Respondent


K. S. SHRIVASTAV, J.

( 1 ) THE plaintiffs are the appellants.

( 2 ) IT is no longer in dispute before me that one Khader Basha had legally married the first plaintiff and the 2nd plaintiff is his daughter. He also legally married the first defendant and the defendants 2 and 3 are his children. On 16-11-1969 he had executed a registered gift deed in favour of the first defendant which is at Ex. B-2. Through this registered gift deed Ex. B-2 he had gifted the plaint b schedule property which is a residential house. The defendants are staying in the suit house. The said Khader Basha died in the year 1972. The plaintiffs filed suit for declaration of their title and possession of the suit house alleging that the plaintiff No. 1 is the widow while the plaintiff no. 2 is the daughter of the deceased Khader Basha and they are the only legal heirs who have inherited the suit house because the defendant No. 1 was the concubine of late Khader Basha and the remaining defendants are his illegitimate children. The defendants resisted the suit.

( 3 ) THE trial Court on assessment of the evidence on record found that the first plaintiff and the first defendant were legally married to late Khader












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top