SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(AP) 1000

C.V.N.SASTRY, P.B.MISHRA
Divisional Railway Manager, South Central Railway, Vijayawada – Appellant
Versus
Labour Enforcement Officer (Central), Rajahmundry – Respondent


( 1 ) THE common question which arises for decision in these writ petitions is whether the licensed porters, who are employed in the Parcel Offices of the Railway, are entitled for payment of the minimum wages as per the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ).

( 2 ) THE competent authority under the Act held in favour of the porters and directed the Railway Administration to pay not only the difference of wages claimed but also a further sum equivalent to the difference of wages as one time compensation. Questioning the said orders of the authority, these writ petitions are filed by the Railway.

( 3 ) IT is not in dispute that employment in loading and unloading in Railways goods sheds, docks and ports was brought within the purview of the Act by adding the same to Part-1 of the Schedule to the Act vide Notification No. S. P. 2092 date 23/04/1983 issued by the Central Government which is the appropriate Government. Likewise employment in ashpit cleaning on Railways was added to Part-I of the Schedule to the said Act vide Notification No. S. O. 2093 dated 23/04/1983. By Notification dated 7/12/1989, the Central Government fixed the minimum rate of wages payab











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top