C.V.N.SASTRY, P.B.MISHRA
Divisional Railway Manager, South Central Railway, Vijayawada – Appellant
Versus
Labour Enforcement Officer (Central), Rajahmundry – Respondent
( 2 ) THE competent authority under the Act held in favour of the porters and directed the Railway Administration to pay not only the difference of wages claimed but also a further sum equivalent to the difference of wages as one time compensation. Questioning the said orders of the authority, these writ petitions are filed by the Railway.
( 3 ) IT is not in dispute that employment in loading and unloading in Railways goods sheds, docks and ports was brought within the purview of the Act by adding the same to Part-1 of the Schedule to the Act vide Notification No. S. P. 2092 date 23/04/1983 issued by the Central Government which is the appropriate Government. Likewise employment in ashpit cleaning on Railways was added to Part-I of the Schedule to the said Act vide Notification No. S. O. 2093 dated 23/04/1983. By Notification dated 7/12/1989, the Central Government fixed the minimum rate of wages payab
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.