SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(AP) 1052

P.S.MISHRA, P.RAMAKRISHNAM RAJU, G.BIKSHAPATHY
N. Sarada Mani – Appellant
Versus
G. Alexander – Respondent


P. RAMAKRISHNAM RAJU, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application filed by the wife under Section 10 of the Indian Divorce Act (hereinafter referred to as act ) seeking divorce on the ground that her husband, the first respondent, is living in adultery with the second respondent and that he treated her with cruelty, beating her and threatening to kill her. The first respondent-husband, while admitting his marriage with the petitioner on 28-6-1989, denied that he received any dowry nor treated the petitioner with any cruelty. He also further denied that he had any illicit intimacy with the second respondent. He alleges that the petitioner herself deserted him two years back. Of course, he does not oppose the petition for divorce, but rests contended by saying that because of the suspicious nature of the petitioner, he got vexed and therefore, he also prays the Court to pass a decree for divorce declaring dissolution of marriage between them. After filing the counter, he remained ex parte during the course of the trial.

( 2 ) THE second respondent in her counter-affidavit states that she is a married woman living with her husband in 257, Housing Board Colony at Rajahmundry. The allegation that














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top