SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(AP) 1076

MOTILAL B.NAIK
Mahboob Bi Sahed – Appellant
Versus
Shaik Abdul Razack Sahed – Respondent


MOTILAL B. NAIK, J.

( 1 ) THE unsuccessful plaintiffs in O. S. No. 175 of 1985 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Srikalahasti are the appellants herein.

( 2 ) FOR the purpose of convenience the parties, are addressed as plaintiffs and defendants as arrayed in the original suit O. S. 175/1985. The plaintiffs instituted the above suit for a declaration of the plaintiffs title over the plaint schedule property and for a permanent injunction restraining the defendants and their men from interferring with the plaintiffs possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule property and for costs of the suit.

( 3 ) BEFORE the tnat Court the case of the plaintiffs in brief is as follows : According to the plaintiffs, the plaint schedule property originally belonged to one Mohammed Ghouse Saheb Gori as his self-acquired separate property. He had put up a house and was living in the said site with his family members. The plaint schedule property was also shown in the name of the said Mohammed Ghouse Saheb Gori as his self-acquired separate property. According to the plaintiffs, the plaint schedule property was also shown in the name of said Mohammed Ghouse Saheb Gori in the books maintained
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top