1997 Supreme(AP) 1119
Andhra Pradesh High Court
Judges : D.H.NASIR, P.S.MISHRA
Matter Taken Up as Suo motu on the News Item Published in Deccan chronicle Newspaper - Appellant
Versus
Principal, Manpower Development College, Maredpally, Secunderabad - Respondent
Decided On : 11-11-97
Headnote:AP PROHIBITION OF RAGGING ACT, 1997 - Public Interest Litigation - Ragging in Educational Institutions - Followingguidelines laid down to deal with ragging
( 1 ) AS per News paper report which appeared in Deccan Chronicle dated 3-12-1996, one Ms. Padmaja, Aged 24 years, student of Post Graduate Master of Computer Applications Course at the Manpower Development College, maredpally, Secunderabad committed suicide in her house as she was unable to bear the ragging in the college. The deceased joined the college during the last week of November, 1996. She was subjected to ragging by her seniors in the college, who asked her to sing or dance in front of others. She was pinched and pushed by the students when she refused to yield to their demand. She complained to the Lecturers, but the same was of no avail and no steps were taken to protect her from ragging, and she became too emotional and suddenly took the extreme step of hanging herself. The members of her family hesitated to lodge a complaint with the police. A neighbour reported the matter to the police and the body was eventually moved to hospital for post-mortem examination.
( 2 ) THIS matter was taken up as Public Interest Litigation and was registered as Writ Petition No. 26132/1996, and the same was heard by a Division Bench of this High Court. Respondents 6 and 7 being the Medical and Health secretariat of the Government of Andhra Pradesh and the District superintendent of Police, Kurnool respectively were directed by an interim order passed on 27-12-1996 to make immediate arrangements for round the clock vigilance and protection of the victims (both men and women) of offending behaviour of B. Navinkumar and others, to ensure that no male student or teacher was permitted into or around ladies cloak room or in the women s hostel, except such persons who may be permitted by the Warden and only at such places where they could meet any girl student of the hostel in the presence of Warden or any other Officer appointed for that purpose by the Principal of the College. The learned advocate Mr. M. V. S. Suresh Kumar, consented to take up the case as Amiens Curiae on behalf of the petitioner,
( 3 ) THE Director of Manpower Development College, West Maredpally, secunderabad in his counter affidavit dated 23-12-1996 refuted the Newspaper report in respect of the death of Ms. Padmaja. He denied any ragging at all in the college. According to him, on 29-11-1996, which was a Friday, only one introductory interaction took place in the college for about half an hour between the seniors and freshers, and that Padmaja did not attend the college on 29-11-1996, This was no ragging, according to him. He further states that the victim did not die due to ragging. He went to the extent of stating on oath that what he learnt was that the parents in order to protect their honour in society, indulged into concealing the real reasons of her death and gave a wrong version.
( 4 ) TWELVE students of the Manpower Development College, Maredpally have filed affidavits unanimously saying that there had been no ragging in their college and that there was no ragging either on 27th, 28th, 29th or 30th november, 1996. In the presence of a Senior staff P. V. Ramana, only senior students were introduced to the freshers and it was merely a healthy and disciplined introduction, and that no senior student or no student or no student misbehaved with B. Padmaja, student of the First Year M. C. A. Class.
( 5 ) ). Respondent No. 11, Registrar in Andhra University, Visakhapatnam, in his counter affidavit dated 15-1-1997 stated that no incident of ragging came to the notice of the University Administration. Respondent No. 14, Registrar in Kakatiya University, Warangal, states in his counter affidavit that he received a Memo dated 27-9-1995 from the Commissioner of Collegiate education directing him that steps should be taken to stop ragging, and the university Administration sent a copy of the same to all the Principals of the constituent and affiliated colleges for taking necessary action. In para four of his counter affidavit, he states that during the