SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(AP) 1179

K.S.SHRIVASTAVA
Kwality Construction Engineers – Appellant
Versus
Central University of Hyderabad – Respondent


K. S. SHRIVASTAV, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application under Section 11 (6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 (for short the Arbitration Act ) for appointment of sole arbitrator to decide various disputes arising out of the agreement dated 22-8-1990.

( 2 ) THE admitted facts of the case, in brief, are that the petitioner-contractor had submitted its tender in answer to the notice inviting tenders issued by the first respondent for construction of indoor and outdoor stadiums at the University Campus in the year 1990. The petitioner-contractor s tender was accepted by the 1st respondent and an agreement was executed. A Work Order bearing No. UH/engg. /308/90-91/162 was issued. The total value of the work was Rs. 32,74,899. 00 and the work was completed by the petitioner-contractor in the month of November, 1992. Final bill of Rs. 15,042. 00 was paid to the petitioner-contractor on 16-10-95 through cheque dated 28-9-1995. There was an arbitration clause in the agreement which is reproduced below : ARBITRATION CLAUSE 40 : Except where otherwise provided in the contract all questions and disputes relating to the meaning of the specifications, designs, drawings and instructions, h


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top