SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(AP) 1163

A.HANUMANTHU, P.VENKATRAMA REDDY
P. JAGANNADHAM – Appellant
Versus
Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, WARANGAL – Respondent


P. VENKATARAMA REDDI, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner who was a Conductor in A. P. S. R. T. C challenges the award of the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Warangal in I. D. No. 95 of 1986 dated 19-2-1987. The writ petition was dismissed for default on 4-12-1996. To-day, we have allowed the petitioner s application for restoration and heard the writ petition on merits.

( 2 ) ON an inspection of the bus, which the petitioner was conducting on17-1-1979, some cash and ticket irregularities were found and the following six charges were framed: (1) For having violated the rule issue and Start . (2) For having failed to issue tickets to a batch of 5 passengers having boarded the bus at Husnabad, Stage No. 11 and bound for Koheda, stage No. 16 despite collecting the requisite fare from them at their boarding point itself. (3) For having failed to issue tickets to three passengers having boarded the bus at Pandilla (Stage No. 12) and bound for Koheda (Stage No. 16) despite collecting the requisite fare from them at their boarding point itself. (4) For having failed to issue tickets to 12 passengers (In batches and individuals) having boarded the bus at Koheda Cross-Roads (Stage no. 14) and bo




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top