S.S.HUSSAINI
Chekka Krishna Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Kotha Appa Rao – Respondent
( 1 )
( 2 ) MR. Y. Venkaieswarlu, the learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent-plaintiff has filed a suit against the petitioner who is the defendant therein for a mere injunction claiming title over certain immovable property which is said to be a tin-shed premises, for which, the petitioner-defendant is also claiming title on the basis of a registered sale deed: but, the respondent-plaintiff challenges the validity of the said sale deed in favour of the petitioner-defendant on the ground that it is invalid in law. The Trial Court, on an application filed by the respondent-plaintiff under Order 16 Rule 6 C. P. C. has allowed the petition to summon admission register and T. C. from E. V. Reddy College, Kodad, which reflects the age of the petitioner as a minor on the dale of execution of the sale deed. In this regard, the learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the Court has no authority to summon a document from the custody of third party, especially public office, without the respondent-plaintiff showing the relevancy of the particular document for adjudication of the rights of the parties in the suit.
( 3 ) ORDER 16 Rule 6 C. P. C.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.