B. K. SOMASEKHARA, J.

( 1 ) THE order of the learned District Munsif, Jadcherla on I. A. No. 353 of 1997 in O. S. No. 25 of 1997 dated 17. 11. 1997 is questioned. The petitioner herein is the plaintiff and the respondents are the defendants.

( 2 ) THE impugned order arose this way:the plaintiff had obtained interim order of temporary injunction in his suit against the respondents. It came to be vacated. The learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the matter is pending in appeal. In the meanwhile, on behalf of the respondents herein I. A. No. 353 of 1997 was filed under Section 151 CPC to grant police protection to them with the allegation that the plaintiff -petitioner was interfering with their possession regarding the suit property. The learned District Munsif passed the following order :"heard Counsel for the petitioners. In view of the fact that the injunction in favour of the respondent has been vacated holding that the respondent/ plaintiff has not produced any document to show that he is presently in possession of the suit house and it is alleged that the respondent/plaintiff is interfering with the possession of the defendants herein. Hence, the petitioners are enti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document