SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(AP) 27

S.R.NAYAK
Sivakoti Dasaradharam – Appellant
Versus
Sivakoti Yoganandam – Respondent


S. R. NAYAK, J.

( 1 ) THE two Appeals Suits arise out of the common judgment and decrees dated 29-10-1983 made in O. S Nos. 207 and 264 of 1978 on the file of the Court of the II Additional Subordinate Judge, Vijayawada dismissing both the suits. The facts pleaded by the parties in the aforementioned two suits are many. Equally large number of documents were produced and marked by the parties in the trial court. But, I do not find any necessity to refer to the pleadings in detail. Similarly I do not find any necessity to refer to all the documents produced and marked by the parties in support of their respective cases. For the purpose of disposal of these two appeals only relevent and material facts be stated briefly as under: Sivakoti Lakshmi Narashimham and Hymavathi were the childless couple. Sivakoti Dasaradharam who is the plaintiff in O. S. No. 207 of 1978 is the adopted son of the couple and he was adopted somewhere in the year 1933. Prior to the marriage of Sivakoti Dasaradharam, Lakshminarasimhan entered into a partition with him on 12-2-1956 in order to satisfy the father-in-law of Sivakoti Dasaradaram, In the said partition, Sivakoti Dasaradharam was given two buildings a



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top