( 1 ) THE petitioners, 8 in all, are the same in each of these seven Civil Revision petitions. All the petitioners, in these Civil Revision Petitions, claimed to have entered into oral agreements of sale in respect of certain landed property with the respondents and their predecessors-in-title. The petitioners, to begin with, filed O. S. No. 145 of 1984 in the trial Court for specific performance of the alleged oral agreement of sale dated 30-11-1964. In that suit the petitioners claimed that they were put in possession of the land in question in pursuance of the said alleged oral agreement of sale dated 30-11-1964. The defendants denied the alleged oral agreement of sale as well as the alleged delivery of possession of the land in question in pursuance of the alleged oral agreement of sale. The trial court, after due trial, dismissed the said suit. The plaintiffs agrrieved by the judgment and decree of the trial Court made in O. S. No. 145 of 1984 have preferred A. S. No. 1404 of 1989 in this Court and the same is pending. The defendants in O. S. No. 145 of 1984, contending that by virtue of an ex parte interim injunction granted by-the trial Court in O. S. No. 145